b1-66er: https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2026/07/09/air-forces-c-5m-super-galaxy-aids-in-removal-destruction-of-5-billion-worth-of-illegal-drugs/
b1-67er: That military drug transport story is just an incredible bucket of hogwash. So any cargo plane can move those pallets of drugs. I can't believe they dig up a 40,000 pound cargo loader to take that picture. There are only a few of those around. I guarantee moving that stuff on the ground would be 10x cheaper.
66: "If not for Air Force assistance, the DEA would have to drive the substances across several states. This in turn would take excessive manpower and time as well as increasing the possibility of security issues, like ambush, theft or logistical failure, the release says."
D4rw1n: Both modes create interesting issues of interstate transport of Schedule 1 narcotics
Which I suppose is perfectly lawful for the government to do. But maybe you avoid some questions by not physically crossing a lot of state borders.
I tend to agree with 67 though. Even the reason reasons they give our little suspect: excessive manpower (that's one advantage the military always has). Ambush (I find it impossible to believe the military can't handle the possibility of an ambush). Theft (same). Logistical failure (the US Army is by far the world's largest and most sophisticated logistics agency).
Here's Google AI's answer to my question of how the US military compares in size and capability to the world's largest private logistics companies:
The US military possesses the largest and most complex logistics capability in the world, far exceeding the scale of any single private corporation. While private companies optimize for cost and efficiency, the US military optimizes for mass, speed, and survivability in highly hostile environments.
So trucking few truckloads of narcotics across the Homeland would be doable for them